Assessment
For Attending and Non-Attending Students
Project Development: Students choose a topic relevant to the course and develop either
(a) an evaluation plan for a public policy, including a complete methodology and proposed data collection and analysis in R, or
(b) a replication of an existing policy evaluation, with critical reflection on the study’s methodology, findings and implications.
For Attending Students
Presentation (30%)
Students present their project to the class, summarising purpose, methodology, expected outcomes (evaluation plans) or main findings and critique (replications).
(ILO2.3, ILO2.4, ILO3.1, ILO3.3, ILO4.1)
Project Report (70%)
A 1,500-word report documenting background, methodology, expected or actual results, analysis in R (for replications) and a critical reflection.
(ILO1.1, ILO1.2, ILO2.1, ILO2.2, ILO2.4, ILO3.1, ILO3.2, ILO3.3, ILO4.1, ILO5.1)
For Non-Attending Students
3. Extended Project Assignment (100%)
A 2,500-word report covering the same criteria as attending students, plus a more detailed literature review. Initial contact with the lecturer within the first four weeks is required.
(ILO1.1, ILO1.2, ILO2.1, ILO2.2, ILO2.4, ILO3.1, ILO3.2, ILO3.3, ILO4.1, ILO5.1)
Project work and presentations are valid for one academic year only.
Evaluation criteria
Presentation:
1. Clarity of Presentation (20%): The student must present content in a manner that is both clear and comprehensible. Complex concepts should be articulated in a way that is accessible to all audience members.
2. Quality of Argumentation (20%): Arguments should be presented in a logical and persuasive manner, with adequate support from empirical data or scholarly literature.
3. Mastery of Technical Terminology (20%): Usage of technical terminology should be precise and contextually appropriate.
4. Interactive Communication Skills (20%): The student’s ability to engage with the audience through responsive Q&A, as well as the effective use of visual aids, will be evaluated.
5. Structure and Organization (20%): The presentation should have a coherent structure with a clear narrative thread throughout.
Project Report:
1. Correct Application of Methods (25%): The report should demonstrate that Impact Evaluation methods have been accurately applied and thoroughly described.
2. Depth of Analysis (25%): The report must reflect a comprehensive analysis and profound understanding of the chosen subject matter.
3. Critical Thinking (25%): The report should critically examine the methods employed and the results achieved, showcasing analytical depth.
4. Accuracy and Completeness (25%): The report must be meticulous in considering and presenting all relevant aspects of the project with precision.